No, The Moon Landings Weren’t Faked. Buzz Aldrin on the Moon with a lunar seismic experiment, July 2.
NASA photo)When you write about space as much as I do (and use a laptop with a big NASA sticker on the cover no less) you’re more than occasionally going to hear the question: did we really land on the Moon? The flag is waving. This is one of the biggest claims waved around (yes, pun intended) by conspiracy fanatics. When the U. S. But there’s no atmosphere on the Moon, how can there be a breeze to blow a flag around? This isn’t proof of location on a Disney sound stage in Burbank. The flag isn’t “waving,” it’s swinging. First of all the U.
S. And when planting the flagpole, the astronauts had a difficult time getting very far into the lunar surface. The struggle to keep it upright for a good photo- op meant that it got some pretty vigorous shaking, and this resulted in a lot of movement. The Moon doesn’t have an atmosphere (aside from some sparsely- scattered ions and dust) but it does have gravity—about one- sixth of Earth’s—and a well- shaken banner will still wave. In fact once they were done fussing with the flagpole, it stayed still for the remainder of the mission.“During a pause in experiments, Neil suggested we proceed with the flag. It took both of us to set it up and it was nearly a disaster.”– Buzz Aldrin. Unfortunately as soon as the ascent stage of the LM launched, returning Neil and Buzz to lunar orbit to meet back up with Michael Collins in the CM, the entire flag was blown over—but from the force of the ascent rockets, not wind. With the flag planted so close to the LM the downward thrust of the rockets was strong enough to push the shallowly- planted flag over.
But those versions will unfortunately never be seen again and here’s why.)2. If there’s no atmosphere on the Moon, where are the stars in the photos? Buzz Aldrin practices taking pictures with his suit- mounted Hasselblad (NASA/JSC scan)This is Photography 1.
The Apollo astronauts were using several types of cameras to record their lunar adventures, one being modified medium- format Hasselblad 5. EL cameras mounted to their spacesuits.
Gmail is email that's intuitive, efficient, and useful. 15 GB of storage, less spam, and mobile access. Discover Peru's sacred land of the Incas. Visit Lima, the Amazon, Cuzco, Puno, Lake Titicaca, trek the Inca Trail and cross the border into Bolivia's La Paz.
All the astronauts went through training on how to shoot with the cameras, so when they got to the Moon they were able to take some really great shots of the surface in beautiful 7. This means that the Sun was in the sky, illuminating the surface and everything the astronauts were doing.
So even though there was no atmosphere above them, the astronauts still had to expose their cameras to account for a very bright lunar landscape (and in some instances with a very big white star we call the Sun in the sky.) They were there to explore the Moon, not the stars, and so they didn’t waste any film taking astrophotos. Long story short, in order to capture stars in their photos they would have had to expose for them in camera, which would have resulted in a very blown- out, blurry lunar surface. It’s just how cameras work—they simply can’t adjust like your eyes do.
From The Land Of The Moon French (2017) Online Banking
Learn more about the lunar cameras here. NOTE: Actually there was a tripod- mounted camera used on the Moon: the Far Ultraviolet Camera/Spectrograph brought on Apollo 1.
That instrument DID take astrophotos, but in ultraviolet wavelengths. Not only did it capture LOTS of stars but also Earth, the aurorae, and distant galaxies. You can still see things in the shadows. They should be completely black with no air to scatter light. Well, yes and no. It’s true that light on Earth is scattered by the atmosphere, and so we can see even where sunlight isn’t directly illuminating a scene.
From The Land Of The Moon French (2017) Online Translator
- The Texarkana Gazette is the premier source for local news and sports in Texarkana and the surrounding Arklatex areas.
- Offering listings of properties across the US and Canada. Includes online search for homes, apartments, builders, and agents.
- The English version offers selected articles from.
And in space, shadows can be incredibly dark because of the lack of this effect. But there is still reflected light, and the lunar surface is reflective. Buzz Aldrin descending the ladder of Eagle. When Neil photographed Buzz descending the ladder onto the Moon’s surface, you can still see him pretty well even though he’s clearly in the shadow of the LM. This is the result of reflected light from the Sun hitting the lunar regolith and bouncing back up into the shadows, not “another source of artificial illumination” claimed by some conspiracists. Again, no atmosphere doesn’t negate the physics of how light works—after all, the Moon is pretty dark in color yet we see it as a very bright object in the night sky, especially when full.
This is a ready testament to its reflectivity (and even then it’s still only reflecting 1. Also don’t forget that in addition to the Sun, the Earth was in the sky above the Apollo astronauts—and it was also reflecting sunlight onto the Moon, just like the Moon does onto Earth. Want an example of how this worked? Check out Ian Goddard’s demonstration site here, and see the results of an experiment on Discovery Channel’s “Mythbusters” here. Added 9/2. 2/1. 4: see an article on Nerdist. Neil Armstrong. 4. The shadows in the photos were uneven.
Therefore alternate lighting sources? No, therefore uneven terrain.
Single- source lighting on a perfectly flat plane will result in perspective- aligned shadows, but on an uneven surface the shadows will “appear” to slant off at different angles as they are projected across the ground. Shadows cast by the Sun will be skewed all over the place. Free Download Killing Ground (2017) Movie. Note how the dust is kicked up in nice billowing arcs by the LRV’s wheels. Radiation would have killed the astronauts en route to the Moon. Radiation in space is very dangerous. Nobody’s contesting that fact.
Even a thickly- hulled spacecraft can allow in enough cosmic radiation to damage living DNA over long durations, and outside of Earth’s protective magnetosphere it becomes an even bigger danger. This in fact is still a major obstacle to overcome if we’re to send humans to Mars or beyond. But the Apollo astronauts weren’t on a year- long voyage to Mars, they were on week- long trips to the Moon. Even the Van Allen belts, which concentrate energetic particles from the Sun into donut- shaped rings surrounding Earth, were passed through pretty quickly by the Apollo spacecraft on their way Moonward. A pretty clear explanation is given by astronomer Phil Plait in his 2.
Bad Astronomy article: “The van Allen belts are regions above the Earth’s surface where the Earth’s magnetic field has trapped particles of the solar wind. An unprotected man would indeed get a lethal dose of radiation, if he stayed there long enough. Actually, the spaceship traveled through the belts pretty quickly, getting past them in an hour or so. There simply wasn’t enough time to get a lethal dose, and, as a matter of fact, the metal hull of the spaceship did indeed block most of the radiation.”(If you really want to get into the math of how the radiation environment of the Van Allen Belts were quite survivable by astronauts, even in the late 1. Now, had the Apollo astronauts been in the way of a strong solar flare event while on the lunar surface, it would have been a different story.
Protected only by their space suits, they could have received a lethal dose of solar radiation very quickly as a cloud of particles swept past the Earth and Moon. Luckily that didn’t happen, but it was an occupational hazard. We didn’t have the technology in the 6. Moon. This is a total cop- out argument. Yes, 1. 96. 0s technology was far inferior to what we have today; even our cell phones contain vastly more computing power than what was aboard the Apollo spacecraft.
But the Apollo spacecraft only had to know how to do one thing: get living, breathing astronauts to the Moon and back. This was achieved through complex engineering and the efforts of many thousands of the brightest minds in the country, not to mention a few fearless astronauts who knew a thing or two about flying experimental aircraft. The Full Opening Night (2017) Movie on this page.
Getting to the Moon was a case of pure physics, dedication, and guts. Read more here on Clavius. Also as a technical note, the circuitry and components of Apollo spacecraft were relatively enormous by today’s standards—they literally were big enough to avoid getting knocked offline by stray atomic particles.